gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
April 29, 2014
|
gptkbp:citation
|
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 464 (2014)
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 25, 2014
|
gptkbp:decision
|
unanimous decision
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
13-132
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
573 U.S. 464 (2014)
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Riley_v._California
|
gptkbp:opinionBy
|
gptkb:John_G._Roberts,_Jr.
|
gptkbp:pages
|
464
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:David_Leon_Riley
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Wurie
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
search and seizure
cell phone privacy
|
gptkbp:volume
|
573
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Eleanor_McCullen,_et_al._v._Martha_Coakley,_Attorney_General_of_Massachusetts,_et_al.
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|