Statements (63)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Set a precedent for future cases.
Reinforced the need for warrants. Influenced public policy. Shaped future legal interpretations. Defined limits on police authority. Highlighted the importance of warrants. Influenced future court rulings. Limited police powers regarding digital searches. Reinforced Fourth Amendment protections. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law
13-212 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
134 S. Ct. 2210
|
| gptkbp:court |
Unanimous decision.
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 25, 2014 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
April 29, 2014
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Legislation on digital data access
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Involved a drug arrest.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Wurie
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Fourth_Amendment_interpretation
Digital_privacy_laws |
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
Technological advancements in communication
|
| gptkbp:isConsidered |
Cell phone data.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito Clarified legal standards for searches. Emphasized privacy in the digital age. Reviewed_by_the_Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined implications of technology on privacy.
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
Constitutional law. Impact on law enforcement practices Affected law enforcement training. Ongoing discussions about privacy rights. Post-9/11 surveillance issues Set a standard for digital searches. Strengthened privacy protections. Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Documented in legal databases.
Reviewed by legal scholars. Significant for civil liberties. Analyzed implications for law enforcement. Critical for understanding digital rights. Examined the balance between security and privacy. Landmark case in digital privacy. Pivotal in the evolution of privacy law. Relevant to current digital privacy issues. Used in law schools for teaching Fourth Amendment. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_on_warrantless_searches_of_cell_phones
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States
David_Wurie |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Cell phones are distinct from other physical items.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Warrant requirement for cell phone searches.
subsequent cases regarding digital privacy |
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Increased awareness of digital rights.
|
| gptkbp:publicSpeaking |
Oral arguments presented.
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
Search and seizure Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Part of a broader discussion on privacy. |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Riley_v._California
|