|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:argument_presented_by
|
gptkb:Jeffrey_L._Fisher
gptkb:Michael_R._Dreeben
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
13-132
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
Unanimous decision
Decided
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
Criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 25, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:None
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 25, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:election
|
9-0
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Riley v. California
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Privacy rights in digital age
|
|
gptkbp:implications_for_citizens
|
Enhanced privacy protections
|
|
gptkbp:implications_for_law_enforcement
|
Need for warrants
|
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
Technological advancements
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:David_Riley
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
Subsequent cases on digital privacy
573 U. S. 373
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Search and seizure
Fourth Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
Expectation of privacy
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
Search and seizure
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Warrant required for cell phone searches
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Privacy rights in digital age
Search incident to arrest
|
|
gptkbp:propulsion
|
gptkb:David_Riley
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Wurie
|
|
gptkbp:responds_to
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Digital data protection
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
3
|