|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
April 29, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
Riley v. California, 572 U.S. 701 (2014)
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 25, 2014
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
unanimous
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
13-132
13-212
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The warrantless search and seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
572 U.S. 701
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:mergedInto
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Wurie
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Riley_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:opinionBy
|
gptkb:John_G._Roberts,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
701
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:David_Leon_Riley
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
cell phone privacy rights
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Warrant required for cell phone searches incident to arrest
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Wurie
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
search and seizure
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
572
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Hall_v._Florida
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|