|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1923-04-12
1923-04-13
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
United States Free Speech Clause case law
1925 in United States case law
United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:268_U.S._652
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1925-06-08
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
majority
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Benjamin_Gitlow_v._People_of_the_State_of_New_York
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The First Amendment applies to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
The state may restrict speech if it has a tendency to result in action dangerous to public security.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Gitlow v. New York
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Edward_Terry_Sanford
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
652
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Benjamin_Gitlow
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
incorporation of Bill of Rights
|
|
gptkbp:relatedConcept
|
gptkb:incorporation_doctrine
freedom of speech
criminal anarchy
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Stromberg_v._California
gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio
gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_New_York
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
civil liberties
freedom of expression
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
268
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Whitney_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|