Statements (99)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
April 20, 2015
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analysis showed impact on citizenship laws.
Analyzed under the 14th Amendment. Implications for future immigration cases. Relevant to ongoing immigration debates. |
| gptkbp:case_judicial_impact_summary |
Summary of the judicial impact.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_impact_summary_details |
Details of the judicial impact summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_outcome_summary |
Summary of the judicial outcome.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_outcome_summary_details |
Details of the judicial outcome summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_precedent_details |
Details of the judicial precedent set.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_precedent_summary |
Summary of the judicial precedent set.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_precedent_summary_details |
Details of the judicial precedent summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_review_outcome_details |
Details of the judicial review outcome.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_review_outcome_summary |
Summary of the judicial review outcome.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_review_outcome_summary_details |
Details of the judicial review outcome summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_significance_details |
Details of the judicial significance.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_significance_summary_details |
Details of the judicial significance summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_arguments_summary |
Summary of the legal arguments presented.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_arguments_summary_details |
Details of the legal arguments summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_outcome_summary_details |
Details of the legal outcome summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_principles_summary_details |
Details of the legal principles summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_significance_summary |
Summary of the legal significance.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_significance_summary_details |
Details of the legal significance summary.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Summary of the case and its implications.
14-333 Involved appeals from lower courts. Involved a child born in the U. S. to Chinese parents. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Affirmed lower court ruling
Details of the judicial outcome. Decision was unanimous. Influenced public policy on citizenship. Majority opinion favored Wong. Ruling favored Wong's claim. Summary of the ruling and its significance. Wong was granted citizenship. Wong was recognized as a U. S. citizen. Reinforced the principle of birthright citizenship. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Significant for immigration law
Details of the legal significance. Judicial significance for citizenship rights. Significant for defining citizenship. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil rights case
Arguments centered on the 14th Amendment. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Set a standard for future citizenship cases.
|
| gptkbp:court_opinion_details |
Majority opinion emphasized citizenship rights.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 15, 2015 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
Dissent argued against birthright citizenship. Dissent raised concerns about immigration policy. |
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
Influenced future immigration cases
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-World War II immigration policy
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Wong
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Clarified birthright citizenship
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Wong
gptkb:United_States |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
135 S. Ct. 1625
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Confirmed citizenship rights.
Judicial review confirmed citizenship rights. Constitutionality of the Immigration and Nationality Act |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:immigration
Summary of the legal context. Details of the legal context summary. Context of immigration law. Legal context of the 14th Amendment. Related to immigration and nationality. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Constitutional law. Details of the judicial impact. Influenced immigration law. Details of the legal framework involved. Impact on judicial interpretation of citizenship. Reinforced the principle of jus soli. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Legal arguments presented in the case.
Legal principles established by the ruling. Birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. Citizenship rights of children born in the U. S. to alien parents |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Summary of the legal outcome.
Expanded interpretation of citizenship Significant for immigrant rights. Wong's citizenship was affirmed. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Jus soli
Summary of the legal principles established. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
| gptkbp:legal_significance_details |
Significant for defining citizenship under U. S. law.
|
| gptkbp:material |
Involved a challenge to citizenship laws.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The Court ruled in favor of Wong
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark
Set a precedent for similar cases Wong Kim Ark case Established principles for citizenship. Set a precedent for citizenship rights. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Mixed opinions on immigration policy
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:14th_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Reaffirmed citizenship for children born in the U. S.
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|