United States v. Southern Railway Co.

GPTKB entity

Properties (44)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf court case
gptkbp:applicationNumber No. 1
gptkbp:caseOutcome Southern_Railway's_practices_were_found_to_violate_the_Sherman_Act
Southern_Railway's_practices_deemed_anti-competitive.
gptkbp:caseTypes antitrust case
gptkbp:citedBy 226 U.S. 620
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
affirmed lower court ruling
gptkbp:date March 2, 1914
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:historical_analysis widely studied in law schools
gptkbp:historicalContext early 20th century antitrust movement
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Southern Railway Co.
gptkbp:impact railroad industry regulations
gptkbp:involved gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Southern_Railway_Company
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
unanimous decision
addressed the legality of railroad monopolies
gptkbp:jurisdiction federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Justice
antitrust laws
influenced future antitrust cases
monopolistic practices are illegal
Southern_Railway's_legal_team
Southern_Railway_required_to_change_practices
influenced_the_interpretation_of_the_Sherman_Act
gptkbp:notableEvent Sherman Antitrust Act
gptkbp:notableFeature resolved
available in legal archives
still cited in antitrust discussions
examined monopolistic behavior in transportation
strengthened_federal_antitrust_enforcement
gptkbp:outcome ruled_in_favor_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day
gptkbp:precedent established antitrust enforcement standards
for future antitrust litigation
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:United_States_v._American_Tobacco_Co.
gptkb:United_States_v._E.C._Knight_Co.
gptkb:Northern_Securities_Co._v._United_States
gptkb:United_States_v._Reading_Co.
gptkbp:significance impact on transportation regulation
gptkbp:soundtrack January 12, 1914
gptkbp:year 1914