Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
1911-12-12
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:Henderson_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil case
|
| gptkbp:concurring_opinion_by |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Taft
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
gptkb:No._1
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1912-01-15
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
226 U. S. 620
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:226_U._S._620
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Reversed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent cases involving federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified federal jurisdiction issues
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Southern_Railway_Co.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|