United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
GPTKB entity
Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
January 12, 1914
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed in legal studies
used as a case study in antitrust law |
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
affirmed lower court ruling
affirmed by the Supreme Court upheld antitrust laws dissenting opinion by Justice Louis Brandeis majority opinion by Justice William Howard Taft |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for economic regulation
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
federal antitrust case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced regulatory practices
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court February 23, 1914 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
1914 U. S. LEXIS 1034
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
context of early 1900s economic policies
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
shaped future transportation policies
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
|
| gptkbp:impact |
railroad industry
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
previous antitrust cases
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
government and railroad company
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
subsequent legal cases
226 U. S. 1 often referenced in law schools |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
against monopolistic practices
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
review of lower court's decision
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
early 20th century antitrust movement
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
set a precedent for future cases framework for antitrust enforcement |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
antitrust laws
debate over government regulation |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
reduced monopolistic control
reduction of railroad rates |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
prohibition of unfair competition
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:U._S._Department_of_Justice
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling against the railroad
court ruled against the railroad company |
| gptkbp:part_of |
U. S. legal history
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
future antitrust cases
established standards for competition |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established precedent in antitrust regulation
impact on transportation regulations significant for economic policy |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1914
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Southern_Railway_Co.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|