Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Documented in legal databases
Criminal law case Documented in legal journals 81-1805 Appealed from lower court decision |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
1983-06-27 |
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
Law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
1982-11-30
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Place
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Search and seizure law
Police procedures |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Terry_stop_doctrine
Fourth Amendment jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:462_U._S._696
Frequently cited in legal arguments Referenced in Supreme Court opinions |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:location
gptkb:United_States |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Judicial review of search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Drug enforcement
Exclusionary rule Fourth Amendment rights Part of Fourth Amendment framework Judgment affirmed Contextualized within drug policy debates Expansion of stop-and-frisk policies |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Reasonable suspicion vs. probable cause
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
Investigative detention
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Florida_v._J._L.
gptkb:Illinois_v._Caballes |
| gptkbp:notable_quote |
" The police may stop and briefly detain a person for investigative purposes if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in criminal activity."
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Affirmed lower court ruling
Influenced future Fourth Amendment cases Majority opinion supported by four justices Reviewed by legal scholars Search upheld Often studied in law schools Search and seizure upheld Analyzed in legal textbooks Analyzed for its constitutional implications Implications for civil liberties Implications for future legal standards Established guidelines for police stops Ruling favored law enforcement Case study in constitutional law courses Impact on police training programs Important for understanding search and seizure law Outcome influenced by public opinion Relevant to current law enforcement practices Reviewed in law reviews Search was deemed reasonable Significant for Fourth Amendment interpretation |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:California_v._Acevedo
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio Set precedent for future cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun Dissent argued against the majority's reasoning |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:United_States_v._Sokolow
gptkb:United_States_v._Hensley gptkb:United_States_v._Montoya_de_Hernandez |
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified reasonable suspicion standard
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:William_J._Brennan
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|