|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
2004-11-10
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
543 U.S. 405
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2005-01-24
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:David_Souter
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
03-923
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Illinois_v._Roy_I._Caballes
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
A dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment.
|
|
gptkbp:historicalPeriod
|
gptkb:Caballes_v._Illinois,_207_Ill._2d_504,_802_N.E.2d_202_(2003)
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Illinois v. Caballes
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
search and seizure
dog sniff
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Illinois
|
|
gptkbp:subsequentHistory
|
Rehearing denied, 544 U.S. 1015 (2005)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|