Statements (47)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
upheld lower court's ruling
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal case
No. 87-1006 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
490 U.S. 1
|
gptkbp:controversy |
reasonable suspicion standard
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1989-06-12 |
gptkbp:firstClaim |
shaped public policy
influenced judicial interpretations led to legal reforms affected community relations influenced police training |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Sokolow
|
gptkbp:impact |
influenced law enforcement practices
|
gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States_government
David_Sokolow |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
Justice Harry Blackmun 4-4 split decision |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
criminal procedure stop and frisk doctrine Fourth_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
reviewed by legal scholars
analyzed in law reviews debated in legal forums important for civil liberties discussed in legal textbooks examined in academic research cited in legal arguments analyzed in constitutional law courses referenced in court opinions analyzed in public policy debates discussed in civil rights advocacy examined in police accountability discussions reviewed in civil liberties organizations studied in law enforcement training programs |
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed the decision of the lower court
|
gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases regarding stop and frisk
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
due process search and seizure probable cause |
gptkbp:research |
observational evidence
|
gptkbp:significance |
established standards for reasonable suspicion
|