|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
legal case
|
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber
|
No. 70-2
|
|
gptkbp:citedBy
|
404 U.S. 123
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
1970
Solicitor General
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
1971
affirmed
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Harris
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
law_enforcement_practices
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.
gptkb:Warren_E._Burger
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
exclusionary rule
reasonable expectation of privacy
Fourth_Amendment_rights
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
search and seizure laws
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
|
|
gptkbp:reviews
|
Justice Harry Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
constitutional law
individual rights
judicial review
civil liberties
due process
privacy rights
police conduct
constitutional interpretation
law enforcement accountability
evidence admissibility
impact on civil rights
precedent for future cases
search warrant requirements
|