Properties (83)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Details of the judicial outcome.
Judicial impact on future cases. Summary of the judicial outcome. Summary of the legal analysis. Details of the legal principles. Federal authority upheld. Impact on future civil rights legislation. Judicial outcome favored civil rights enforcement. Summary of the judicial precedent set. Summary of the legal impact on civil rights. Summary of the legal principles established. Summary of the outcome and its significance. Conclusion_drawn_by_the_Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
No. 65 Details of the judicial review process. Details of the judicial impact. Details of the judicial precedent. Summary of the judicial impact on civil rights. |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
383 U.S. 745
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
Scope of federal power.
|
| gptkbp:court |
Established judicial precedent for civil rights.
Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1966-12-12 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
1966-10-18
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Influenced future civil rights cases.
|
| gptkbp:hasLegalEvent |
Details of the legal impact.
|
| gptkbp:heldIn |
The federal government can regulate private acts of discrimination.
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Civil_Rights_Movement.
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Historical context of the civil rights movement.
Historical significance in civil rights law. |
| gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
Summary of the historical significance.
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Background on civil rights violations.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Guest
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Expanded federal power to combat discrimination.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan_II Dissent argued for state sovereignty. Judicial outcome favored federal intervention. Judicial review of civil rights legislation. Majority opinion emphasized federal authority. State rights vs. federal intervention. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction.
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analysis of federal vs. state powers.
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
Affirmed lower court's decision. Affirmed the application of federal law. Discriminatory intent. Framework for civil rights enforcement. Interstate commerce clause. U.S._Solicitor_General. |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Decided.
Arguments presented by both sides. Analysis of the implications for civil rights. Details of the case proceedings. Judgment in favor of federal authority. Judicial review of civil rights enforcement. Outcome of judicial review on civil rights. Relevant to ongoing civil rights discussions. Significant for federal civil rights law. Summary of the case findings. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Strengthened federal anti-discrimination laws.
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
5-4. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set precedent for federal intervention.
Subsequent civil rights legislation. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Details of the legal context.
Implications for state and federal law. Legal context of the civil rights era. Summary of the legal context surrounding the case. Heart_of_Atlanta_Motel_v._United_States Katzenbach_v._McClung |
| gptkbp:significance |
Important for civil rights enforcement.
|
| gptkbp:team |
Details of the legal framework established.
Summary of the legal framework established. Judicial precedent for civil rights legislation. Legal analysis of the case's implications. Legal framework for civil rights protections. Legal impact on civil rights enforcement. Legal principles established by the case. Legal significance in the context of civil rights. |