Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
November 10, 2003
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Constitutionality of sentencing guidelines
Examined the role of juries in sentencing |
| gptkbp:case_legal_reform |
Reform of sentencing guidelines
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
03-473
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Reviewed by the Supreme Court
Increased judicial discretion Overturned mandatory sentencing guidelines Sentencing discretion granted to judges Sentencing guidelines no longer mandatory |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Changed federal sentencing landscape
Significance in criminal justice reform |
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal law
Sentencing reform Focused on Sixth Amendment rights |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced future sentencing guidelines
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 24, 2004 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
03-473
|
| gptkbp:election |
6-3
|
| gptkbp:followed_by |
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Fanfan
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Federal sentencing practices
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
David Fanfan |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
542 U. S. 36
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Judgment delivered by the Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Details of judicial review process
Judicial review of sentencing practices |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_court_system
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Context of federal sentencing law Details of the legal context surrounding the case |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Details of the impact on judicial practices
Framework for federal sentencing Impact on judicial sentencing authority Judicial outcomes affected by the ruling |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Sentencing guidelines
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Details of the Supreme Court's ruling
Advisory nature of sentencing guidelines established |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Judicial discretion in sentencing
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analysis of judicial discretion in sentencing
Analyzed the implications of advisory guidelines |
| gptkbp:material |
Involved a drug trafficking conviction
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Sentencing guidelines deemed advisory
|
| gptkbp:preceded_by |
gptkb:United_States_v._Booker
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent sentencing cases
Precedent for future cases Set a precedent for judicial discretion |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Booker
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:United_States_v._Booker
|
| gptkbp:relevant_statute |
18 U. S. C. § 3553
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Influenced the application of the Sixth Amendment
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Booker
gptkb:Booker_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|