Properties (74)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
03-633
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
543 U.S. 220
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
January 12, 2005 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
November 10, 2004
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Booker
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Sentencing reform
Increased judicial discretion in sentencing |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Constitutionality of sentencing guidelines |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Impact on plea agreements
Impact on judicial independence Impact on the role of substance abuse evaluations in sentencing Impact on the role of sentencing guidelines in plea deals Impact on the role of rehabilitation programs in sentencing Impact on appellate review of sentences Impact on federal criminal justice system Impact on federal judges' sentencing practices Impact on mandatory minimum sentences Impact on rehabilitation in sentencing Impact on sentencing disparities Impact on sentencing guidelines' authority Impact on sentencing outcomes Impact on state sentencing laws Impact on the Sentencing Commission Impact on the appeals process Impact on the balance of power in sentencing Impact on the concept of justice in sentencing Impact on the public perception of sentencing Impact on the rights of defendants Impact on the role of family support in sentencing Impact on the role of fines in sentencing Impact on the role of incarceration in sentencing Impact on the role of juries in sentencing Impact on the role of parole in sentencing Impact on the role of probation in sentencing Impact on the role of prosecutors Impact on the role of restitution in sentencing Impact on the role of sentencing alternatives Impact on the role of sentencing enhancements Impact on the role of sentencing memoranda Impact on the role of sentencing reductions Impact on the role of social science in sentencing Impact on the role of victim impact statements Impact on the role of restorative justice in sentencing Impact on the role of cultural considerations in sentencing Impact on the role of job training programs in sentencing Impact on the role of mental health evaluations in sentencing Impact on the role of community involvement in sentencing. Impact on the role of expert testimony in sentencing Impact on the role of educational programs in sentencing Impact on the role of community service in sentencing Impact on the role of community resources in sentencing Impact on the effectiveness of deterrence in sentencing Impact on the role of victim-offender mediation in sentencing Impact on the role of sentencing circles in sentencing Impact_on_the_Sixth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Sentencing guidelines
Federal sentencing law Changed the application of federal sentencing guidelines |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Mandatory sentencing guidelines are advisory
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:David_Booker |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Blakely
Influenced subsequent sentencing cases |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Fanfan
gptkb:United_States_v._Johnson gptkb:Gall_v._United_States gptkb:Pepper_v._United_States gptkb:United_States_v._Concepcion gptkb:Kimbrough_v._United_States |