Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Analysis of the case outcome
Details of the case outcome available in legal reports Impact on local law enforcement practices Limited state authority in immigration enforcement |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
567 U.S. 387
|
| gptkbp:context |
SB_1070_legislation
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-3 ruling
Set precedent for future immigration law cases |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 25, 2012 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
April 25, 2012
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Extensive legal analysis in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Post-9/11 immigration policies
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Arizona
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced state immigration laws
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Constitutionality of state laws Clarified roles of state and federal governments Influenced future immigration cases Judicial reasoning focused on federal authority Judicial review of state immigration laws |
| gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
Analysis of legal frameworks involved
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Justice
gptkb:Arizona_Attorney_General's_Office Immigration enforcement Supremacy Clause Implications for state sovereignty Part of broader immigration reform discussions Debate over state vs. federal powers Struck down provisions allowing police to check immigration status Clarified federal supremacy in immigration matters Consequences for state immigration laws Upheld provision requiring immigrants to carry registration documents |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Documented in legal archives
Used as a case study in law schools Summary available in legal databases Frequently referenced in legal discussions Relevant to ongoing immigration debates Analyzed in legal textbooks Significant in the context of federalism Critiqued_by_legal_scholars |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Parts_of_Arizona's_immigration_law_were_struck_down
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:State_of_Arizona |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
State laws cannot interfere with federal immigration enforcement
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions from various groups
Impact on state-level immigration enforcement policies |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Arizona_v._United_States
Implications for civil rights |
| gptkbp:sideEffect |
Increased scrutiny of state immigration laws
|
| gptkbp:significance |
National debate on immigration policy
|
| gptkbp:team |
Related to immigration legislation debates.
|