Properties (48)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Influenced public policy on immigration
Struck down key provisions Reaffirmed federal supremacy Clarified federal immigration authority Defined scope of state immigration laws Limited state law enforcement powers Partial victory for the federal government State immigration enforcement strategies |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil rights case
|
gptkbp:controversy |
Federal authority
State_sovereignty |
gptkbp:court |
Unconstitutional provisions
Influence on future immigration cases |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 25, 2012 |
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Challenged by the federal government
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Arizona v. United States
|
gptkbp:impact |
State immigration policies
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Constitutionality of state laws Mixed ruling State vs. federal power Concern over federal overreach State vs. federal jurisdiction Unanimous decision on some provisions |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Constitutional law
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
gptkb:SB_1070 gptkb:Arizona_Attorney_General Immigration law Immigration enforcement Preemption doctrine State law enforcement limits State vs. federal immigration enforcement |
gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
National attention
|
gptkbp:notableEvent |
State immigration enforcement laws
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
567 U.S. 387
Landmark immigration case |
gptkbp:outcome |
Parts_of_Arizona's_SB_1070_were_struck_down
|
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States_government
gptkb:State_of_Arizona |
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
Support for federal immigration policy |
gptkbp:precedent |
Limits on state immigration laws
|
gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial immigration law
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Texas
|
gptkbp:significance |
Federal vs. state immigration law
|