|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
March 25, 1997
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
96-1667
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 28, 1997
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:historical_significance
|
Influence on future cases
Debate on state regulation of elections
Discussion on electoral fairness
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Civic engagement
Political activism
Voter turnout
Political discourse
Political party regulations
State election laws
Campaign financing
Electoral participation
Electoral system reforms
Judicial review of election laws
Legal standards for elections
Political party strategies
Public perception of elections
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
Timmons
Twin Cities Area New Party
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
520 U. S. 351
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
Affirmed lower court's decision
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:Voting_rights
First Amendment rights
Political association rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Election law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:David_J._Becker
gptkb:Thomas_J._G._Mc_Carthy
|
|
gptkbp:modern_relevance
|
Election integrity
Political competition
Third-party ballot access
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Court upheld the state law
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Ballot access laws
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Green_Party_of_New_Jersey_v._Murphy
gptkb:Libertarian_Party_of_New_Hampshire_v._Gardner
gptkb:Anderson_v._Celebrezze
gptkb:Crawford_v._Marion_County_Election_Board
gptkb:Burdick_v._Takushi
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
Minnesota election laws
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Impact on third-party candidates
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Anderson_v._Celebrezze
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|