|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 1, 1982
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
81-1513
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
unconstitutional restrictions
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
constitutional law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 21, 1983
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for
|
gptkb:political_representation
election integrity
democratic participation
state election laws
election administration
voter registration processes
political equality
candidate eligibility
federal election standards
judicial review of election laws
political party access
state vs. federal authority in elections
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Anderson v. Celebrezze
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
ballot access laws
|
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
political climate
voter turnout issues
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Anderson
Celebrezze
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
460 U. S. 780
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:Voting_Rights_Act
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:U._S._Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
election law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
favor of Anderson
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
strict scrutiny
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
expanded access to ballots
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Burdick_v._Takushi
election-related cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Cousins_v._Wigoda
gptkb:Illinois_State_Board_of_Elections_v._Socialist_Workers_Party
gptkb:Storer_v._Brown
gptkb:Timmons_v._Twin_Cities_Area_New_Party
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Anderson
Celebrezze
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
voter rights
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1983
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Brnovich_v._Democratic_National_Committee
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|