Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
March 25, 1992
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Criticized for limiting voter access.
Relevant to discussions on voter ID laws. Examines the constitutionality of election procedures. |
| gptkbp:case_number |
Available in legal databases.
91-1974 Appealed from the Supreme Court of Hawaii. A significant Supreme Court ruling on voting rights. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Set precedent for future voting rights litigation.
The Court upheld the state's election law. The law was found to be constitutional. Upholding of state law. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Addresses the balance between election integrity and voter access.
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 25, 1992
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 4, 1992 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
91-1974
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 4, 1992
|
| gptkbp:held_in |
States can impose reasonable restrictions on voting.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Burdick v. Takushi
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced state election laws.
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
Burdick
Takushi |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
504 U. S. 428
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
Reasonable restrictions on voting.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review of state election laws.
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_court_system
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Continues to influence election law debates.
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Voting rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Election laws
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Affirmed lower court's decision.
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Strict scrutiny standard for voting laws.
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:State_of_Hawaii |
| gptkbp:material |
Involved a challenge to a Hawaii election law.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Voting rights cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Anderson_v._Celebrezze
gptkb:Crawford_v._Marion_County_Election_Board |
| gptkbp:vote_split |
7-2
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Anderson_v._Celebrezze
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|