The Steel Seizure Case

GPTKB entity

Statements (44)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs gptkb:Youngstown_Steel_case
gptkbp:arguedDate May 12, 1952
gptkbp:citation gptkb:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld
gptkb:343_U.S._579
gptkb:Dames_&_Moore_v._Regan
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Harold_Hitz_Burton
gptkb:Stanley_Forman_Reed
gptkb:Robert_H._Jackson
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date June 2, 1952
gptkbp:decision majority
gptkbp:defendant gptkb:Charles_Sawyer
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Sherman_Minton
gptkb:Stanley_Forman_Reed
gptkb:Fred_M._Vinson
gptkbp:fullName Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. et al. v. Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, et al.
gptkbp:heldBy President lacked authority to seize steel mills
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label The Steel Seizure Case
gptkbp:impact Defined limits of executive power in emergencies
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkbp:notableFor Justice Jackson's concurrence on presidential power
gptkbp:numberOfIssues Presidential power to seize private property
gptkbp:officialName gptkb:Youngstown_Sheet_&_Tube_Co._v._Sawyer
gptkbp:pages 579
gptkbp:plaintiff gptkb:Youngstown_Sheet_&_Tube_Co.
gptkbp:predecessor Presidential authority cases
gptkbp:principle Checks and balances
Limits on executive power
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Korean_War
gptkb:Separation_of_powers
Presidential powers
gptkbp:result Steel mills returned to private owners
gptkbp:subject gptkb:constitutional_law
Labor law
Administrative law
gptkbp:USPresidentInvolved gptkb:Harry_S._Truman
gptkbp:volume 343
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:343_U.S._579
gptkbp:bfsLayer 7