Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer

GPTKB entity

Statements (46)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs gptkb:Steel_Seizure_Case
gptkbp:arguedDate May 12, 1952
gptkbp:citation gptkb:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld
gptkb:343_U.S._579
gptkb:Dames_&_Moore_v._Regan
gptkb:Medellin_v._Texas
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Sherman_Minton
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Harold_Hitz_Burton
gptkb:Robert_H._Jackson
gptkbp:constitution gptkb:Article_II_of_the_U.S._Constitution
Separation of powers doctrine
gptkbp:date June 2, 1952
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:decision majority
gptkbp:defendant gptkb:Charles_Sawyer
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Stanley_Forman_Reed
gptkb:Fred_M._Vinson
gptkbp:fullName gptkb:Youngstown_Sheet_&_Tube_Company_et_al._v._Sawyer,_Secretary_of_Commerce,_et_al.
gptkbp:heldBy The President does not have the authority to seize private property without Congressional authorization
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
gptkbp:impact Landmark case on separation of powers
gptkbp:importantFor Defined limits of presidential power in domestic affairs
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:location gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkbp:notableFor Justice Jackson's concurrence outlining three categories of presidential authority
gptkbp:pages 579
gptkbp:plaintiff gptkb:Youngstown_Sheet_&_Tube_Company
gptkbp:predecessor Presidential authority cases
gptkbp:principle Checks and balances
Limits on executive power
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Harry_S._Truman
gptkb:Korean_War
gptkb:Executive_Order_10340
gptkbp:result Executive order invalidated
gptkbp:subject gptkb:Separation_of_powers
Presidential powers
Steel industry seizure
gptkbp:volume 343
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Fred_M._Vinson
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5