Supreme Court decision in Mapp v. Ohio

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:amendedBy	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
gptkbp:citation	367 U.S. 643
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Hugo_Black gptkb:William_O._Douglas gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkbp:date	1961-06-19
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter gptkb:Charles_Evans_Whittaker gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio,_367_U.S._643_(1961)
gptkbp:heldBy	Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state courts
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Supreme Court decision in Mapp v. Ohio
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkbp:overruledBy	gptkb:Wolf_v._Colorado
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Dollree_Mapp
gptkbp:predecessor	application of exclusionary rule to states
gptkbp:principle	exclusionary rule applies to states
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Wolf_v._Colorado gptkb:Weeks_v._United_States
gptkbp:response	gptkb:State_of_Ohio
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:exclusionary_rule criminal procedure search and seizure
gptkbp:votingSystem	6-3
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:1961_in_American_law
gptkbp:bfsLayer	5