Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
No. 1 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
338 U.S. 25
|
| gptkbp:court |
Affirmed the lower court's ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 12, 1949 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
October 12, 1948
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Post-World_War_II_America
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Wolf v. Colorado
|
| gptkbp:impact |
State law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Jackson
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:State_of_Colorado
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Civil rights
Civil liberties Public safety Constitutional interpretation Federalism Judicial review Criminal procedure Due process Constitutional rights Legal ethics Constitutional amendments Legal standards Rights of the accused Rights of citizens Privacy rights Judicial activism Search and seizure Exclusionary rule Strengthened Fourth Amendment protections Search warrants Judicial precedent Influenced state court rulings Evidence admissibility Law enforcement authority Law enforcement accountability Effectiveness of exclusionary rule Incorporation of the Fourth Amendment State versus federal rights State_sovereignty |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Fourth_Amendment_rights_applied_to_states
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Wolf
gptkb:State_of_Colorado |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
Establishment of exclusionary rule at state level |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio gptkb:Katz_v._United_States gptkb:Illinois_v._Gates gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio |