Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:amended_by |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
October 12, 1948
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Often studied in law schools
Analyzed implications for law enforcement Relevant to discussions on privacy rights |
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
Originated in Colorado state courts |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Affirmed lower court ruling
Majority opinion emphasized state rights States not bound by exclusionary rule Court ruled on the applicability of the exclusionary rule |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Key case in civil rights law
Important for understanding civil liberties in the U. S. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil rights case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced civil liberties discussions
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
January 14, 1949 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Jackson
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-World War II legal landscape
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Wolf v. Colorado
|
| gptkbp:impact |
State law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
Wolf and Colorado
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
338 U. S. 25
|
| gptkbp:judges |
5-4 decision
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
Justices Murphy and Jackson |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Search and seizure laws
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:Constitution
Influenced state constitutional amendments Limited federal oversight of state law enforcement |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
Debate over state versus federal authority |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Clarified the role of the exclusionary rule in state courts
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined state versus federal rights
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Exclusionary rule not applicable to states
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
Set precedent for future Fourth Amendment cases Established limits on state police powers |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
Related to state constitutional law |
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified application of the exclusionary rule
Influenced future Fourth Amendment interpretations |
| gptkbp:subsequent_legal_developments |
Led to further cases on search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1949
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|