|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:appliedAmendment
|
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:appliedToStatesBy
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
590 U.S. ___ (2020)
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
April 20, 2020
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
18-5924
|
|
gptkbp:effect
|
invalidated non-unanimous jury convictions in Louisiana and Oregon
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial requires a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant of a serious offense.
|
|
gptkbp:historicalPeriod
|
gptkb:Ramos_v._State,_231_So._3d_44_(La._Ct._App._2017)
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Ramos v. Louisiana
|
|
gptkbp:legalImpact
|
required unanimous jury verdicts in state criminal trials for serious offenses
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Louisiana
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Johnson_v._Louisiana
gptkb:Apodaca_v._Oregon
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Evangelisto_Ramos
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
non-unanimous jury verdicts
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_Louisiana
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
jury unanimity
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Roberts_Court
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|