gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 15, 1971
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
Affirmed conviction
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
Allowed non-unanimous verdicts in some states
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 20, 1972
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
70-17
|
gptkbp:election
|
5-4
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
Post-1960s civil rights era
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Apodaca v. Oregon
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:State_of_Oregon
Joaquin Apodaca
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
406 U. S. 404 (1972)
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:Oregon
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Conviction upheld
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
non-unanimous jury verdicts
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
Johnson v. Louisiana
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Impact on jury trial rights
|
gptkbp:subsequent_overruled_by
|
gptkb:Ramos_v._Louisiana
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Ramos_v._Louisiana
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|