Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Details of the conviction upheld
Impact analysis of the case on future law Conviction_affirmed_by_the_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law case
Analysis of the significance of the case |
| gptkbp:court |
Influenced state laws on jury verdicts
Affirmed_the_conviction_of_Apodaca |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 20, 1972 |
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Led to reevaluation of jury verdict laws
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Post-Civil_Rights_era_jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Originated_in_Oregon_state_courts
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Apodaca v. Oregon
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future jury trial rights cases
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice Harry Blackmun
Argued against non-unanimous verdicts Impact on future jury trial rights cases Judicial outcome favored state law Majority opinion supported non-unanimous verdicts Outcome of judicial review of state law Supreme_Court_review_of_state_law |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Oregon
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Analysis of legal context of the case
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined the fairness of jury trials
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Analysis of the legal outcome of the case
Debate over jury unanimity requirements Non-unanimous verdicts permissible in some states Part of the legal framework for jury trials Sixth_Amendment_right_to_a_jury_trial Addressed_the_scope_of_the_Sixth_Amendment Jury_trial_rights_in_the_United_States Upheld_Oregon's_non-unanimous_jury_law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
406 U.S. 404 (1972)
Analysis of jury trial rights Referenced in legal discussions on jury trials Relevant to discussions on jury reform Significant in jury trial jurisprudence Details_of_the_Supreme_Court's_decision Study_of_jury_trial_rights_in_America |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:State_of_Oregon
Joaquin_Apodaca |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Non-unanimous jury verdicts are constitutional
Used in later cases regarding jury verdicts |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Johnson_v._Louisiana
Implications for state jury laws |
| gptkbp:viewpoint |
Dissent argued for stricter jury requirements
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|