Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
November 1, 1988
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
mixed ruling on employee rights
public employees have some First Amendment protections |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for public sector employees
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
employment law
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 19, 1989 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
87-1189
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
O' Connor v. Ortega
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced public sector employment law
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
480 U. S. 709
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
public employee speech |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:National_Education_Association |
| gptkbp:material |
involved the implications for public trust in government employees
involved the implications for employee rights in government settings involved the implications for employee speech protections in the workplace involved First Amendment protections for public employees involved the implications for free speech in government employment involved the implications for employee conduct standards involved the implications for public sector labor relations involved the implications for employee rights in public service. involved the implications for government oversight of employee behavior involved a dispute over workplace conduct involved a psychiatrist's dismissal involved a public employee's speech involved a public hospital setting involved issues of workplace privacy involved the implications for public sector unions involved the implications for workplace policies involved the role of government as an employer involved the implications for government employee relations involved the evaluation of employee speech in the workplace involved the implications for employee rights advocacy involved the concept of public interest in employee speech involved the implications for employee accountability involved the balance of interests between speech and efficiency involved the implications for public sector employment practices involved the implications for public sector employee protections involved the implications for employee rights in public institutions involved the implications for public sector management involved the implications for employee rights in the workplace involved the implications for government accountability to employees involved the implications for whistleblower protections |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled in favor of Ortega
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent public employee cases
set standards for balancing employer interests and employee speech rights |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Connick_v._Myers
gptkb:Pickering_v._Board_of_Education |
| gptkbp:significance |
established standards for public employee speech rights
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1989
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:City_of_Ontario_v._Quon
gptkb:Skinner_v._Railway_Labor_Executives'_Association |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|