Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
December 1866
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Part of a series of cases during Reconstruction
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction
Majority opinion emphasized federal authority Impact on future federal-state relations Significant for Reconstruction era legal battles Ruling limited state challenges to federal authority Established precedent for future federal-state relations |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
|
| gptkbp:context |
Post-Civil War Reconstruction era
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
February 1867 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_J._Field
Dissent argued for state rights |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
Doctrine of political questions
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Reconstruction policies in the South
|
| gptkbp:historical_impact |
Significant in the context of American legal history.
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Highlighted tensions between state and federal authority
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mississippi v. Johnson
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future cases regarding state and federal powers
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_Mississippi
gptkb:President_Andrew_Johnson |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
4 Wall. 475 (1867)
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Limited scope of judicial review in political questions
Narrowed scope of judicial review in political disputes |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Constitutional framework of the United States
Influenced the interpretation of the Reconstruction Acts Dismissed without a hearing Set limits on judicial intervention in political matters Defined limits of judicial authority in political matters |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Enforcement of Reconstruction Acts
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Set a precedent for federal intervention in state matters
Reinforced federal supremacy over state laws |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:Separation_of_powers
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_Mississippi
gptkb:lawyer Examined the scope of executive power |
| gptkbp:modern_relevance |
Important for understanding Reconstruction era jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court ruled against the state of Mississippi
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Cited in later Supreme Court decisions
Set precedent for federal authority over states |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_F._Miller
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Ex_parte_Mc_Cardle
Influenced later cases on executive power |
| gptkbp:significance |
First case to address the Reconstruction Acts
|
| gptkbp:year |
1867
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:the_NAACP
gptkb:National_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Colored_People gptkb:NAACP |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|