Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Relevant to discussions on civil liberties
Analyzed in legal textbooks Implications for future habeas corpus cases |
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
Originated in lower federal courts |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Reflected political tensions of the era Influenced future Supreme Court cases Dismissed without a hearing Jurisdiction was stripped by Congress Majority opinion by Justice Samuel Miller Mc Cardle's appeal was dismissed Ruling on jurisdictional authority Significant for Reconstruction jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Important for understanding judicial limits
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Writ of habeas corpus
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced future interpretations of judicial power
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Salmon_P._Chase
|
| gptkbp:court_opinion_date |
February 1869
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1869 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
No dissenting opinion
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
February 1869
|
| gptkbp:has_authority_over |
Limited by legislative action
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Civil Rights and Reconstruction
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Important in the context of civil rights.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ex parte Mc Cardle
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced debates on judicial authority
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:William_Mc_Cardle
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
74 U. S. (7 Wall.) 506
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Unanimous decision
|
| gptkbp:judicial_limitations |
Established limitations on judicial review
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Limited by Congress
Limited by legislative action |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Post-Civil War legal issues
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Congress can limit Supreme Court's jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Dismissal based on jurisdictional grounds
Mc Cardle was held in military custody |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:Separation_of_powers
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Reconstruction_Acts
|
| gptkbp:material |
Involved a challenge to military jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court dismissed the case
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set precedent for jurisdictional limits
Subsequent cases regarding jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Klein
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Reconstruction_Era
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Established limits on Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Mississippi_v._Johnson
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|