gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
April 19, 1995
|
gptkbp:category
|
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
1995 in United States case law
United States electoral redistricting case law
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:515_U.S._900
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 29, 1995
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
94-631
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Miller,_et_al._v._Johnson,_et_al.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Miller v. Johnson
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
gptkbp:legalHolding
|
Redistricting based predominantly on race is subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause.
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Georgia
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
|
gptkbp:pages
|
900
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
gptkb:Bush_v._Vera
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Shaw_v._Reno
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:U.S.
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause
redistricting
racial gerrymandering
|
gptkbp:volume
|
515
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Shaw_v._Reno
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|