Properties (140)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 75-120
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Benefits termination requires a hearing.
Ruling emphasized fairness in administrative procedures. Outcome influenced administrative law. Impact on judicial decisions regarding due process. Detailed_reasoning_behind_the_Court's_decision. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil case
Civil rights case. Details of the judicial impact of the case. 75-138 Examined the balance of interests. Judicial framework for due process. Reasoning_behind_the_Court's_ruling. |
| gptkbp:category |
Administrative law.
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
424 U.S. 319
|
| gptkbp:court |
Affirmed the lower court's decision.
Affirmed the need for a pre-termination hearing. |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
March 21, 1976 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
November 18, 1975
|
| gptkbp:hasLegalEvent |
Details of the legal precedent set.
|
| gptkbp:hasLegalStatus |
Detailed legal analysis of the case.
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Appealed from lower court ruling.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mathews v. Eldridge
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Administrative law
Influenced administrative law and welfare rights. Influenced welfare reform. |
| gptkbp:influenced |
Social_Security_Act_amendments.
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
gptkb:Goldberg_v._Kelly
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart gptkb:Justice_Byron_White gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr. gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist Justice Harry Blackmun |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_jurisdiction
United_States_federal_law. |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Due process in administrative hearings
Balancing test for due process rights. Balancing test for due process. Due process protections were expanded. Set a standard for future due process cases. Social security benefits termination. Reinforced the importance of procedural due process. The three-part test for determining the necessity of a hearing. Social_Security_Administration_regulations. |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Judicial review of administrative actions.
Influenced public policy on welfare. Analyzed the rights of individuals in administrative processes. Analysis of judicial reasoning in the case. Arguments presented by both parties. Decided. Important for understanding administrative law. Key case in due process jurisprudence. Significance in judicial history. Judgment_favored_Mathews. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
The_Court_ruled_that_the_due_process_clause_requires_a_hearing_before_the_termination_of_disability_benefits.
The_Court_ruled_that_the_due_process_clause_requires_a_hearing_before_the_termination_of_social_security_disability_benefits. |
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:John_Eldridge
gptkb:Robert_Mathews Eldridge,_Secretary_of_Health,_Education,_and_Welfare |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent cases involving due process in administrative law
Subsequent cases involving due process in administrative law. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Cleveland_Board_of_Education_v._Loudermill
gptkb:Goldberg_v._Kelly gptkb:Perry_v._Sindermann gptkb:Hewitt_v._Helms gptkb:Morrissey_v._Brewer Legal representation. Legal analysis. Social justice. Constitutional law. Legal precedents. Judicial review. Legal frameworks. Administrative discretion. Administrative hearings. Administrative law judges. Administrative law principles. Administrative procedures. Burden of proof. Context of welfare benefits. Details of the legal context surrounding the case. Due process clause. Entitlement to benefits. Fair hearing rights. Government benefits. Implications for government agencies. Judicial fairness. Judicial oversight. Judicial principles. Judicial standards. Legal accountability. Legal doctrines. Legal due process. Legal interpretations. Legal obligations. Legal principles of access. Legal principles of accountability. Legal principles of advocacy. Legal principles of due process. Legal principles of equity. Legal principles of fairness. Legal principles of inclusion. Legal principles of justice. Legal principles of participation. Legal principles of representation. Legal principles of transparency. Legal processes. Legal protections. Legal remedies. Legal responsibilities. Legal rights of individuals. Legal rights. Legal standards of review. Legal standards. Procedural due process. Public assistance. Rights of the disabled. Social security disability. Social security law. Social welfare law. |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Social_Security_Administration
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Established standards for procedural due process.
Established the balancing test for due process rights. |
| gptkbp:team |
Implications for future legal cases.
Details of the legal framework established. Details of the legal outcome. Established a framework for due process. Legal analysis of due process requirements. Outcome affected future welfare cases. Principles of fairness and justice. Set a precedent for administrative hearings. Significance in the realm of civil rights. Significant impact on administrative law. |