Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:arguedDate |
1975-11-11
1975-11-12 1975-11-10 |
| gptkbp:citation |
424 U.S. 1
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
1976-01-30
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
75-436
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Limits on election spending in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 are unconstitutional if they restrict free speech.
Mandatory disclosure and reporting provisions are constitutional. Limits on individual contributions to political campaigns are constitutional. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
424 U.S. 319
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:First_Amendment
campaign finance |
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
per curiam
|
| gptkbp:officialName |
gptkb:Buckley_v._Valeo
|
| gptkbp:pages |
319
|
| gptkbp:relatedLegislation |
gptkb:Federal_Election_Campaign_Act_of_1971
|
| gptkbp:volume |
424
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Mathews_v._Eldridge
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|