Goldberg v. Kelly

GPTKB entity

Properties (48)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:applicationNumber No. 68-3
gptkbp:caseOutcome Reinforced the necessity of fair hearings.
Welfare recipients must be given a hearing before benefits are terminated.
Established a precedent for due process in administrative law.
gptkbp:caseTypes Civil rights case
gptkbp:citedBy 397 U.S. 254
gptkbp:controversy November 18, 1969
gptkbp:court gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
5-4 ruling.
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
1970
gptkbp:historicalContext Civil rights movement.
gptkbp:homeGround Involved the termination of welfare benefits.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Goldberg v. Kelly
gptkbp:impact Influenced welfare reform
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
Justice Harry Blackmun
Judicial review of administrative actions.
gptkbp:jurisdiction Federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
Due process rights
Social Security Act
Entitlement to benefits
Expanded rights for welfare recipients.
Right to a hearing
Set a standard for future welfare cases.
gptkbp:notableEvent gptkb:Welfare_Reform_Act
gptkbp:notableFeature Frequently cited in legal arguments.
Important for understanding welfare rights.
Influenced public policy on welfare.
Relevant in discussions of social justice.
Strengthened procedural due process.
Used in law schools for teaching due process.
Examined the balance between state interests and individual rights.
gptkbp:outcome Reversed lower court decision
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation gptkb:John_Kelly
gptkb:Daniel_Goldberg
gptkbp:politicalParty Brennan_opinion
gptkbp:precedent Administrative law
Due process in administrative hearings
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Mathews_v._Eldridge
gptkb:Goldberg_v._Kelly_II
Administrative due process.
Implications for state welfare programs.
gptkbp:significance Established due process requirements for welfare benefits
gptkbp:team Legacy of protecting individual rights.