Statements (158)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:court_cases |
| gptkbp:affects |
U. S. Constitution interpretation
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Examined in law schools
still cited in legal arguments today often studied in law schools Frequently cited in legal studies analyzed the limits of executive power |
| gptkbp:case_number |
documented in legal history
5 U. S. (1 Cranch) 137 Landmark case in U. S. history involved a political appointment part of the development of constitutional law |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Marshall
gptkb:Majority_opinion_by_John_Marshall unanimous decision Unanimous decision Foundation for judicial authority Influenced constitutional law development Marbury's request denied denied Marbury's request for a writ of mandamus asserted the judiciary's role in government established the power of the Supreme Court influenced the balance of power in government reaffirmed the role of the judiciary significance in American constitutional law influenced the development of constitutional interpretation |
| gptkbp:case_repercussions |
repercussions on future Supreme Court cases
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark case in U. S. law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
constitutional law case
Civil case |
| gptkbp:consequences |
strengthened the judiciary
|
| gptkbp:context |
political conflict between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:James_Madison gptkb:William_Marbury |
| gptkbp:court_decision_analysis |
analyzed for its implications on government power
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
February 24, 1803 |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
gptkb:No._13
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
principle of judicial review
Judicial supremacy principle of judicial supremacy |
| gptkbp:established |
judicial review
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
early 19th century
Early 19th century America political conflict between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans Context of early American governance |
| gptkbp:historical_impact |
Set precedent for future cases
strengthened the judiciary |
| gptkbp:historical_period |
Early 19th century
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Foundation of U. S. constitutional law
foundation of judicial authority |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Marbury v. Madison
|
| gptkbp:impact |
American legal system
American constitutional law Strengthened the judiciary |
| gptkbp:influenced |
subsequent Supreme Court rulings
subsequent interpretations of the Constitution |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Federalist_Papers
gptkb:Judiciary_Act_of_1789 Political conflict between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:James_Madison
gptkb:William_Marbury |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:James_Madison
gptkb:William_Marbury |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:5_U._S._137_(1803)
5 U. S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
The Supreme Court found it had no jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:John_Marshal
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:Yes
political implications established by this case power to invalidate laws has changed over time by this case protects minority rights Critical for democracy between branches of government ongoing discussions in legal circles shapes legal arguments for democracy upholds rule of law Broad interpretation Central to discussions on judicial power Checks legislative and executive actions Debate over judicial power Ensures laws comply with the Constitution Ongoing discussions in legal circles Power of courts to review laws applies to federal and state laws argue against judicial overreach argue for its necessity critical in constitutional interpretation debate over judicial activism debated by political theorists defended by legal scholars enduring influence on American law ensures laws comply with the Constitution limits legislative and executive power remains a vital issue in law set by this case the power of courts to review laws to legislative supremacy used in landmark cases function of judicial review in the legal system importance of judicial review in democracy role of judicial review in protecting rights the principle of judicial review was established |
| gptkbp:legacy |
Enduring impact on U. S. law
legacy in American jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:U._S._Constitution
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Guardian of the Constitution
Power to invalidate laws established by the case set the foundation for future judicial review cases part of the legal framework of the U. S. power to interpret the Constitution significant impact on the power of the judiciary |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Judicial_review
appointment of justices Writ of mandamus Marbury's right to his commission |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Established judicial review as a principle
Marbury's commission was not delivered Marbury's commission was denied denied Marbury's request for a writ of mandamus |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:checks_and_balances
gptkb:Separation_of_powers separation of powers authority of the Supreme Court |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:material |
Political appointments controversy
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Established the principle of judicial review
Marbury's commission was not delivered affirmed the power of the Supreme Court |
| gptkbp:part_of |
U. S. legal history
|
| gptkbp:political_impact |
Strengthened the Federal judiciary
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
future Supreme Court cases
Established judicial review as a power Influenced future Supreme Court cases future cases involving judicial review set precedent for judicial review |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges gptkb:Brown_v._Board_of_Education gptkb:Mc_Culloch_v._Maryland gptkb:Judicial_Review |
| gptkbp:related_concept |
Checks and balances
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Constitution_of_the_United_States
gptkb:Judiciary_Act_of_1789 separation of powers |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark decision
First case to apply judicial review first case to apply judicial review |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._government
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
2
|