Statements (28)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:author |
gptkb:Justice_William_Johnson
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
10 U.S. 87
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Affirmed the sanctity of contracts |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1810
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
Doctrine of vested rights
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Early 19th century America
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Fletcher v. Peck
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future property law cases
|
| gptkbp:influence |
Influenced the development of constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:internationalRelations |
gptkb:Georgia
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:John_Peck
gptkb:Robert_Fletcher |
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice_Thomas_Todd
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Contract Clause
Land grant and its validity |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Ex post facto laws
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Set a precedent for federal authority over state laws
Fletcher_v._Peck,_10_U.S._87_(1810) |
| gptkbp:outcome |
State law declared unconstitutional
Strengthened the power of the judiciary |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Established judicial review for state laws
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Marbury_v._Madison
|
| gptkbp:significance |
First case to strike down a state law as unconstitutional
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
6-1 decision
|