Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
January 19, 2011
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Frequently discussed in law schools
Relevant to discussions on civil liberties Criticized for expanding police powers Examined police conduct during searches Impacts law enforcement's approach to searches |
| gptkbp:case_number |
Available in legal databases
09-1272 Case summarized in legal textbooks Involved a warrantless search of an apartment Originated from Kentucky state courts |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
Influenced future Fourth Amendment cases Court ruled in favor of Kentucky Expanded police authority in certain situations Majority opinion emphasized exigent circumstances Allowed warrantless entry under specific conditions |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Important for Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Clarified exigent circumstances in search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:date |
January 19, 2011
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 21, 2011 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Justice Ginsburg's dissent |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
April 21, 2011
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
Law enforcement practices
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kentucky v. King
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
Kentucky (Petitioner)
King (Respondent) |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Cited in legal opinions
563 U. S. 452 |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy in Fourth Amendment law
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Search and seizure laws
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Affirmed lower court's decision
Analyzed under the Fourth Amendment |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Set a precedent for future cases
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Reasonable belief of destruction of evidence
|
| gptkbp:material |
Involved a drug investigation
|
| gptkbp:notable_majority |
Justice Alito's majority opinion
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Police can enter a residence without a warrant if they believe evidence is being destroyed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
warrantless entry in exigent circumstances
Exigent circumstances doctrine |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Mc_Neely
gptkb:Brigham_City_v._Stuart gptkb:Fernandez_v._California gptkb:Illinois_v._Mc_Arthur |
| gptkbp:significance |
Influenced police procedures regarding entry without a warrant
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Brigham_City_v._Stuart
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|