Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
2013-10-15
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Relevant to Fourth Amendment discussions
Examined consent in absence of co-occupant Impacts law enforcement search procedures |
| gptkbp:case_number |
12-7822
Originated from a police search incident |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
Majority opinion supported by four justices Affirmed lower court's decision Influenced future consent search cases Affirmed the validity of consent given by one occupant Warrantless search upheld by the court Warrantless search was justified |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Important for Fourth Amendment interpretation
Significant for understanding consent in searches. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced police search protocols
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:David_Fernandez
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Justices opposed to the ruling Scalia argued against majority ruling |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2014-02-25
|
| gptkbp:fire_department |
Search of apartment
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Fernandez v. California
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Used in lower court rulings
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:David_Fernandez
gptkb:California |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
134 S. Ct. 1126
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Judgment in favor of California
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices in favor of the ruling
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Search and seizure law
Context of domestic violence and police response |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Part of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
Consent vs. co-occupant's objection Consent can override objections in certain circumstances |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Legal precedent for future cases
Search deemed reasonable |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Expectation of privacy
|
| gptkbp:material |
Involved a domestic violence incident
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Warrantless search upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Consent searches
Consent can be given by one occupant Established guidelines for consent searches |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Georgia v. Randolph
Illinois v. Rodriguez |
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified consent search doctrine
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
Physical evidence
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Kentucky_v._King
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|