International Shoe Co. v. Washington

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	1945-11-14
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:Asahi_Metal_Industry_Co._v._Superior_Court gptkb:Burger_King_Corp._v._Rudzewicz gptkb:Daimler_AG_v._Bauman gptkb:Goodyear_Dunlop_Tires_Operations,_S.A._v._Brown gptkb:World-Wide_Volkswagen_Corp._v._Woodson 326 U.S. 310
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:courtOpinionUrl	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/326/310/
gptkbp:date	1945-12-03
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:State_of_Washington
gptkbp:docketNumber	63
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:International_Shoe_Company_v._State_of_Washington,_Office_of_Unemployment_Compensation_and_Placement,_et_al.
gptkbp:heldBy	A state may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant if the defendant has 'minimum contacts' with the state such that the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	International Shoe Co. v. Washington
gptkbp:legalSubject	due process civil procedure personal jurisdiction
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone
gptkbp:overruledBy	Pennoyer v. Neff (in part)
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:International_Shoe_Company
gptkbp:predecessor	minimum contacts doctrine
gptkbp:subject	unemployment compensation tax
gptkbp:unanimousDecision	yes
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Harlan_F._Stone_(as_Chief_Justice)
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6