Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown
GPTKB entity
Statements (16)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
564 U.S. 915 (2011)
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
June 27, 2011
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decision |
unanimous opinion
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
10-76
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A., et al. v. Brown, et al.
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
A state court may not exercise general personal jurisdiction over a foreign subsidiary of a U.S. parent corporation solely because some of its products are distributed in the forum state.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown
|
| gptkbp:opinionBy |
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Daimler_AG_v._Bauman
|
| gptkbp:subject |
civil procedure
personal jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:International_Shoe_Co._v._Washington
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|