Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
70-4
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Significant for state-federal relations
Clarified the scope of state regulatory power Influenced state conservation laws Set precedent for future commerce cases Struck down restrictive state law Reinforced the principle of free trade among states Highlighted the tension between state and federal law Set a standard for evaluating state laws affecting commerce Emphasized the importance of interstate commerce in law Contributed to the development of commerce clause jurisprudence Invalidated_state_law_restricting_baitfish_sales |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
441 U.S. 322
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
Influenced state regulation of commerce |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 20, 1971 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
January 19, 1971
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Appealed_from_Oklahoma_Supreme_Court
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hughes v. Oklahoma
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Commerce Clause interpretation
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice Harry Blackmun
Reinforced federal supremacy Balancing state interests against federal interests Supreme_Court_review_of_state_law |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Interstate commerce
Dormant Commerce Clause Protection of interstate commerce State vs. Federal authority Expanded interpretation of the Commerce Clause Interstate commerce implications Part of the legal framework for interstate commerce regulation Petitioner_represented_by_John_D._McCarty Respondent_represented_by_John_D._McCarty State's_interest_in_conservation |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Available in legal databases
Examined state law's impact on interstate trade Frequently cited in legal opinions Key case in commerce clause jurisprudence Relevant to environmental law and commerce Used in law schools for commerce clause discussions |
| gptkbp:outcome |
State law struck down
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Established limits on state regulation of interstate commerce
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Baldwin_v._G.A.F._Seelig,_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Influenced future commerce clause cases
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Oklahoma
|