Statements (57)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argument_type |
Economic protectionism
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Examined state interests vs. federal interests
Relevant to commerce and trade law |
| gptkbp:case_number |
78-1
Background of the case Involved fishing regulations |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Struck down state law
Majority opinion favored interstate commerce Set precedent for future commerce cases Affected state fishing laws Majority opinion emphasized commerce Ruling against state law State law deemed unconstitutional Struck down protectionist law |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Influence on future cases
Significant for interstate commerce law. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Constitution
Arguments presented by both sides |
| gptkbp:consequences |
State laws must comply with federal standards
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
Justices against |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1979-06-25
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
1970s legal landscape
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hughes v. Oklahoma
|
| gptkbp:impact |
State regulations on commerce
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
441 U. S. 322
|
| gptkbp:judges |
7-2
Justices in favor |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutionality of state laws
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Interstate trade regulations
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:U._S._Constitution
Reinforced federal authority State regulations on fishing |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Interstate commerce
State vs. federal powers Protection of local industry |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Affirmed lower court ruling
Clarified limits of state regulation |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:Dormant_Commerce_Clause
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Impact on state sovereignty
|
| gptkbp:material |
Originated in Oklahoma
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
State law struck down
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Commerce Clause interpretation
Commerce Clause Limits on state power |
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:State_of_Oklahoma
gptkb:Hughes |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Bacchus_Imports,_Ltd._v._Dias
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Influence on state commerce laws
Protection of interstate commerce |
| gptkbp:state_law_challenged |
Oklahoma law on minnows
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Taft_Court
gptkb:Charles_Evans_Hughes |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|