Statements (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
November 4, 2014
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
affects digital search policies
analyzes implications for civil rights examines legal reasoning |
| gptkbp:case_number |
appeal from lower court
13-1302 involves search of cell phone |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
unanimous ruling
shapes law enforcement policies affirms digital privacy rights influences future cases on privacy majority opinion emphasizes privacy reviews implications for future cases victory for privacy advocates |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark decision
examines impact on Fourth Amendment jurisprudence important for privacy law |
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
digital privacy rights
search and seizure laws |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
November 4, 2014
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 21, 2015 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
dissent argues for law enforcement flexibility |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
January 21, 2015
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
law enforcement practices
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Holt v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
privacy rights in digital age
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
135 S. Ct. 853
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
reasonable expectation of privacy
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
reversed lower court ruling
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
constitutional law
ensures constitutional adherence |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
modern technology challenges |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
constitutional protections
expanded Fourth Amendment protections |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
searches of cell phones require warrants |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
unconstitutional search
discusses ramifications for police practices |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
Fourth Amendment interpretation |
| gptkbp:material |
arrest of a suspect
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled in favor of Holt
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Riley_v._California
search incident to arrest guides future legal interpretations increased scrutiny of police searches |
| gptkbp:public_interest |
civil liberties
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
|
| gptkbp:significance |
cell phone search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2015
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Justice_Brewer
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|