|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court
1940 in United States case law
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
311 U.S. 32
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
November 12, 1940
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
Judgment reversed
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
84
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Due process was violated by enforcing a class action judgment against parties not adequately represented
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Hansberry v. Lee
|
|
gptkbp:involvedLaw
|
gptkb:Due_Process_Clause
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Chicago,_Illinois
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
Carl Hansberry
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
class action due process requirements
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Lorraine_Hansberry
Hansberry family
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
Anna M. Lee
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Set precedent for adequate representation in class actions
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
racially restrictive covenants
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:racial_covenants
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
8
|