Statements (61)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
November 5, 2012
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed by legal scholars
Relevant to discussions on police powers Critiqued by civil rights organizations Implications for future canine searches Influenced state legislation on drug searches |
| gptkbp:case_number |
Documented in legal databases
Summary available in legal literature 11-817 Appealed from Florida Supreme Court |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Reversed lower court ruling
Impact on law enforcement training Details of the ruling discussed in legal forums Reviewed by Supreme Court justices Expanded interpretation of Fourth Amendment Majority opinion emphasized need for evidence |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Important for civil liberties discussions
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Set standards for canine searches
Influenced police procedures regarding drug searches |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:date |
October 31, 2012
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
February 19, 2013 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Scalia Concerns over canine reliability Concerns about law enforcement practices |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
gptkb:2013
|
| gptkbp:election |
5-4 decision
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Florida v. Harris
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Clayton_Harris
Florida law enforcement |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
568 U. S. 237
568 U. S. 237 (2013) |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Judicial review of lower court's decision
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Part of ongoing debate on search and seizure rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Clarified standards for canine searches
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
Arguments about canine reliability |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Evidence obtained was inadmissible
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Probable cause standard
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court ruled in favor of Harris
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Illinois_v._Caballes
Reliability of canine alerts Influenced future cases regarding search and seizure |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Kagan Reliability of drug detection dogs |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Mixed reactions from legal experts
|
| gptkbp:publications |
Published in law journals
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Florida_v._Jardines
gptkb:Illinois_v._Caballes Followed by further legal challenges Cited in later drug detection cases |
| gptkbp:significance |
Addressed the reliability of drug detection dogs
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Florida
|
| gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
Canine sniff
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Illinois_v._Gates
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|