Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926) Supreme Court case

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Village_of_Euclid,_Ohio_v._Ambler_Realty_Co.
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:272_U.S._365
gptkbp:constitutionalIssue	gptkb:Due_Process_Clause_of_the_Fourteenth_Amendment police power
gptkbp:date	1926-11-22
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:Ambler_Realty_Co.
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Pierce_Butler gptkb:Justice_Willis_Van_Devanter gptkb:Justice_James_C._McReynolds
gptkbp:heldBy	Zoning ordinances are constitutional under the police power of the state.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926) Supreme Court case
gptkbp:impact	Upheld the constitutionality of zoning laws
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalSubject	zoning land use regulation
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Euclid,_Ohio
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_George_Sutherland
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:Village_of_Euclid,_Ohio
gptkbp:predecessor	zoning law in the United States
gptkbp:relatedConcept	Euclidean zoning
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Nectow_v._City_of_Cambridge
gptkbp:subject	municipal zoning ordinance
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Euclid,_Ohio
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7