Statements (17)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
277 U.S. 183
|
| gptkbp:constitution |
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
| gptkbp:date |
1928
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:City_of_Cambridge
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
A zoning ordinance that does not bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
zoning
due process |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Cambridge,_Massachusetts
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Sutherland
|
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
Nectow
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Village_of_Euclid_v._Ambler_Realty_Co.
|
| gptkbp:unanimousDecision |
true
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Village_of_Euclid_v._Ambler_Realty_Co.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Nectow v. City of Cambridge
|