|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1927-04-22
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:Skinner_v._Oklahoma
Buck v. Bell, 272 U.S. 365 (1927)
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:William_Howard_Taft
gptkb:Pierce_Butler
gptkb:Edward_Terry_Sanford
gptkb:George_Sutherland
gptkb:Harlan_F._Stone
gptkb:Willis_Van_Devanter
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1927-05-02
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting
|
gptkb:James_Clark_McReynolds
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
292
|
|
gptkbp:hasDoctrine
|
substantive due process
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, is constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
272 U.S. 365
|
|
gptkbp:involvedState
|
gptkb:Virginia
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legacy
|
Controversial precedent for eugenics laws in the United States
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Virginia_State_Colony_for_Epileptics_and_Feebleminded
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Buck_v._Bell
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
No
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
365
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Carrie_Buck
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:John_Hendren_Bell
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
eugenics
compulsory sterilization
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
272
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Village_of_Euclid_v._Ambler_Realty_Co.
gptkb:Village_of_Euclid_v._Ambler_Realty_Co._(1926)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|