Eisenstadt, Sheriff v. Baird

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Eisenstadt_v._Baird
gptkbp:amendedBy	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:arguedDate	November 17, 1971
gptkbp:citation	405 U.S. 438
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Douglas gptkb:Justice_Marshall gptkb:Justice_White
gptkbp:date	March 22, 1972
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:Thomas_Eisenstadt
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Chief_Justice_Burger gptkb:Justice_Blackmun gptkb:Justice_Powell
gptkbp:heldBy	Unmarried persons have the same right to possess contraceptives as married persons.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Eisenstadt, Sheriff v. Baird
gptkbp:legalSubject	privacy equal protection contraception
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
gptkbp:originatedIn	gptkb:Massachusetts
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:William_Baird
gptkbp:predecessor	gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Roe_v._Wade gptkb:Griswold_v._Connecticut
gptkbp:subject	Massachusetts law prohibiting distribution of contraceptives to unmarried persons
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Eisenstadt_v._Baird
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6