|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:amendedBy
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
gptkb:Ninth_Amendment
gptkb:Third_Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
United States Supreme Court cases
1965 in United States case law
United States privacy case law
United States reproductive rights case law
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:381_U.S._479
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Arthur_Goldberg
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1965-06-07
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:State_of_Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Estelle_T._Griswold_et_al._v._State_of_Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
the Constitution protects a right to privacy
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Earl_Warren
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
constitutionality of a Connecticut law banning the use of contraceptives
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Connecticut_Comstock_Law
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:C._Lee_Buxton
gptkb:Estelle_Griswold
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Lawrence_v._Texas
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
gptkb:Eisenstadt_v._Baird
|
|
gptkbp:relatedConcept
|
unenumerated rights
penumbras
substantive due process
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
right to privacy
contraception
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Griswold v. Connecticut
|