U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama

E475044

Equal Protection Clause case U.S. Supreme Court case criminal procedure case landmark decision

Norris v. Alabama is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from the Scottsboro cases that held the systematic exclusion of Black citizens from juries unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Disambiguation Statements Elicitation Referenced by

All labels observed (3)

Label	Occurrences
Norris v. Alabama	1
Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935)	1
U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama canonical	1

How this entity was disambiguated

This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4855265 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama
Context triple: [Scottsboro, associatedWith, U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama]

A. Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
B. NAACP v. Alabama
NAACP v. Alabama is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened constitutional protections for freedom of association by preventing states from forcing advocacy groups to disclose their membership lists.
C. Stone v. Mississippi
Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
D. Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a city ordinance that gave officials broad discretion to deny parade permits, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil rights demonstrators.
E. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
F. None of above. chosen
G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama
Target entity description: Norris v. Alabama is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from the Scottsboro cases that held the systematic exclusion of Black citizens from juries unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

A. Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
B. NAACP v. Alabama
NAACP v. Alabama is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened constitutional protections for freedom of association by preventing states from forcing advocacy groups to disclose their membership lists.
C. Stone v. Mississippi
Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
D. Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a city ordinance that gave officials broad discretion to deny parade permits, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil rights demonstrators.
E. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
F. None of above. chosen

Statements (50)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	Equal Protection Clause case ⓘ U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ criminal procedure case ⓘ landmark decision ⓘ
areaOfLaw	civil rights ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ criminal law ⓘ
aroseFrom	Scottsboro cases ⓘ linked to: Scottsboro Boys trials of the 1930s prosecution of Clarence Norris ⓘ
category	United States Supreme Court cases involving the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court ⓘ United States Supreme Court cases on equal protection ⓘ
citation	294 U.S. 587 ⓘ
constitutionalProvision	Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ linked to: Equal Protection Clause
court	Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate	1935-04-01 ⓘ
decisionType	opinion of the Court ⓘ
fullName	Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935) ⓘ linked to: U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama
historicalContext	Jim Crow era racial segregation and discrimination in the American South ⓘ
holding	Evidence of long-continued, pervasive exclusion of Black citizens from juries establishes a prima facie case of discrimination ⓘ Systematic exclusion of Black citizens from jury service violates the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ
impact	became a foundational precedent for later jury discrimination cases ⓘ strengthened constitutional protections against racially discriminatory jury selection ⓘ
jurisdiction	appellate ⓘ
juryDiscriminationFinding	Black citizens had been excluded from jury service in the county for many years ⓘ
laterCitedBy	Batson v. Kentucky ⓘ Swain v. Alabama ⓘ
legalIssue	racial discrimination in jury selection ⓘ systematic exclusion of Black citizens from juries ⓘ
locationOfEvents	Jackson County, Alabama ⓘ
opinionBy	Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes ⓘ
pageInUnitedStatesReports	587 ⓘ
partyRaceIssue	Black defendant ⓘ
petitioner	Clarence Norris ⓘ
proceduralPosture	review of criminal conviction ⓘ
recognizedRight	right of Black citizens not to be excluded from juries on account of race ⓘ right of criminal defendants to a jury selected without racial discrimination ⓘ
relatedCase	Patterson v. Alabama ⓘ Powell v. Alabama ⓘ Scottsboro Boys cases ⓘ linked to: Scottsboro Boys trials of the 1930s
remedy	case remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion ⓘ conviction reversed ⓘ
respondent	State of Alabama ⓘ linked to: Alabama
standardOfProof	prima facie case of discrimination can be shown by statistical and historical evidence ⓘ
stateInvolved	Alabama ⓘ
topic	jury selection ⓘ racial discrimination ⓘ
volumeOfUnitedStatesReports	294 ⓘ
vote	unanimous decision ⓘ
yearDecided	1935 ⓘ